Review: Canopus/Grass Valley ADVC110 analog to digital converter with micro-TBC to capture VHS and other analog videotapes 3
Support ProVideo Coalition
Shop with Filmtools Logo

What Do You Think? Let Us Know.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John A. Mozzer

Thank you for this very informative article. The Canopus ADVC110 has been my workhorse for digitizing VHS and SVHS videotapes since 2009. In fact, back then, I was even getting wonderful customer support on using the product from Grass Valley.

I highly recommend the ADVC110 to this day, and I get a little upset about video tutorials on YouTube showing how to digitize analog video using a cheap device that compresses to H.264. Also, they often screw up the aspect ratio, and have to adjust it later, which isn’t the way to go. On the other hand, the DV25 códec used by the ADVC110 properly follows the Rec. 601 specification. In my experience, software knows how to properly scale it to square pixels (and crop transition samples on the left and right edges too) to 4:3 video on-the-fly during playback.

I never understood why I didn’t need a standalone TBC. Thanks for explaining that the Canopus ADVC110 has a built in TBC!

I think using ADVC110’s S-Video input may have solved a problem that I was having with sudden luminance drops in the resulting digital video. At least, I haven’t seen it since I started using it.

Recently, I tried Blackmagic Design’s Ultrastudio HD Mini for digitizing VHS and SVHS videotapes. But I ended up dismayed over the reality that it has no feature allowing S-Video input. So I went back to using the Canopus ADVC110!

John A. Mozzer

I subscribe to your email notifications, and received your email linking to this article this morning!

Jason Molenda

I’ve been curious about using the Ultrastudio HD Mini in the same way, I think there was an article a couple of years ago on this site suggesting that for archiving purposes, keeping a copy of the original interlaced video in h.264 was worthwhile and I think implying that the Ultrastudio could record that format. I figured I would use something like Blackmagic design’s Mini Converter Analog to SDI with an s-video to BNC breakout cable. But if you want a TBC it has to be added before that conversion by a separate device — I’ve never looked beyond there, this isn’t something I know much about.

Jason Molenda

Great article, thanks for putting this together, I have to archive old VHS tapes occasionally and I’m always interested in getting the best captures I can, with the thought that I might be the last person to have access to the original analog versions. I think something might have search&replaced the model name in the article, it’s the ADVC110 but the article consistently refers to it as the AVCHD110.

David

Thanks for this great article. I have never had any luck using a modern Apple M1 computer and the last two operating systems (Monterey and Ventura, but not tested with Sonoma yet) with DV and the double-adapters you’ve mentioned even though others have said they work. I had been using a Sony DSR-45A as my go-between for S-Video to FW into an older Mac using FCP 7 (!) But I recently switched to what another commenter mentioned above… a BMD UltraStudio HD Mini paired with a BMD Analog to SDI mini converter and S-Video Y/C breakout cable and digitize with DaVinci Resolve. This seems to work well and it’s one less old computer I have to worry about booting.

But I am curious, how do these two setups I mentioned work with no discernable TBC? Are there micro-TBC’s built into both the DSR-45A and the BMD converters? And would the ADVC110 do something better? I want to know if it’s worth trying.

Alessandro Machi

If there is no way to adjust the levels, then the TBC is actually a TBS, aka Time Base Stabilizer.

Gilles van Leeuwen

Thanks for this great article.

I was looking for a better way to capture mini dv. I’ve been using the double adapter setup, and with FCPX I’m able to capture perfect DV in native interlaced, great.

But that will give me seperate shots. Which is what we wanted back in the day to be able to edit the footage. But not what I want now. Will this deck capture one straight clip?

Will it also keep on capturing if there are gaps in the dv tape? Because either FCP or QuickTime will just stop capturing.

I’ve been capturing analog Hi8 with a digital8 camcorder, but that gives time drifts. Will this deck also solve that problem?

Memo Sauceda

This article was a bit over my technical knowledge level. I do have a Canpus, but couldn’t find the DIP switches, I’m assuming I have to open the Canopus to access them? If that is the case I rather let somone else do this, but I will definitely show them this article for reference. Thank you!

George

Hi Allan,

Stumbling upon your wonderful article was such a boon for me! It was refreshing to see others are still using the ADVC110.

I have had a Panasonic AG 1980 VCR and Canopus ADVC 110 sitting on my desk staring at me for over 13 years, waiting for me to transfer piles of VHS tapes. I have been a bit paralyzed by not wanting to commit to such an effort without knowing what I am doing, specifically looking for the approach that wouldn’t lose quality unnecessarily. I previously used iMovie to transfer a few, but I suspected my approach was not optimal. Your discussion on the DV25 codec was the missing link for me. Based on your article, I should use iMovie, but only to produce the non-transcoded file, then use another program to convert it to progressive, and whatever processing I wish to perform.

I have a few questions/clarifications on the article points if you have time:
1) Should I use the TBC on my Panasonic VCR, if the ADVC110 also has a “mini TBC”?
2) Are there more affordable options for testing NTSC black level and the post processing, other than FCP, Davinci Resolve or Premiere? Or is it one of those “bite the bullet” things to get the best results?
3) For archival purposes, is it most important to retain the non-transcoded files?
4) Thank you for the link to Scott Schramm’s videos on FireWire. The Thunderbolt-FireWire adapter appears to be out of stock everywhere. If I have an old 2011 MacBook Pro with a FireWire port, would is there any downside to using the machine for just the capture step, then switch over to my M2 MacBook Pro for the remaining post processing steps? Or should I seek out the adapters on eBay, etc. to use my M2 MBP?

Thanks again!

George

Awesome. Thanks! I look forward to the articles on the actual processing.

You Might Also Like