Experts

Review: Senal ENG-18RL dynamic interview microphone

I tested the Senal ENG-18RL microphone, and compared it to the RØDE Reporter.

Omnidirectional dynamic microphones with balanced XLR connections remain the first choice for most ENG (electronic news gathering) organizations to connect to broadcast cameras or most professional audio recorders for informal, handheld interviews, for reasons covered in prior articles. Last year, I reviewed the RØDE Reporter against the very popular Electro-Voice RE50N/DB, and the RØDE Reporter won in sound and price according to ProVideo Coalition readers/viewers/listeners. Now I am analyzing and comparing the Senal ENG–18LR with last year’s winner, in specs, sound and price. This time the video was shot by Francisco Javier Arbolí using his Sony PXW-X70 camcorder at 1080p 50 megabits per second 4:2:2 10-bit, and I recorded the audio on my Tascam DR–10X plugin recorder at 48 kHz, the standard for audio for video. Let’s see and hear how these two microphones compare.

What is common among the two tested mics

  • Both are dynamic (not condenser), so neither require phantom power.
  • Both have balanced XLR analog outputs.
  • Both are marketed for ENG (electronic news gathering), i.e. informal field interviews and standups.
  • Both have an omnidirectional pickup pattern (not a cardioid or otherwise directional one), so both are much more forgiving when one of the two people in an interview unexpectedly interrupt one another with a single microphone passed back and forth.
  • Both are black in color, and fortunately, neither is reflective on camera.
  • Both are plenty long enough to accept a mic flag with no problem, even if you have larger hands.
  • Both the Senal ENG–18RL and the RØDE Reporter and an impressive 10-year warranty. The Senal ENG–18RL has a palindromic street price of US$99, while the RØDE Reporter (first reviewed in 2015) has a street price of US$129 as of publication time of this article. More about the price in the conclusion section of this article.

What is different among the two tested mics

Length

senal_eng_18rl_hand_held_omni_dynamic

At 231 mm long, the ENG–18RL is not as long as the 272.50 mm RØDE Reporter, although both mics are plenty long to use with a traditional cube or triangle mic flag.

branded windscreen

Both could certainly be used with a branded windscreen, as I covered in my RT and DirecTV Sports go beyond conventional mic flags article from July 2014, illustrated above.

The ENG–18RL is slightly more portable, while the RØDE Reporter will give you more reach in case you ever have to interview someone much taller than you, like the Dominican singer Juan Luis Guerra (200 cm — 6’7“) or the Tanzanian basketball player Hasheem Thabeet (263 cm — 7’3”).

Published frequency response and sensitivity

The Senal ENG–18RL has a published frequency response of 50 Hz to 18 kHz, while the RØDE Reporter has a published frequency response of 70 Hz – 15 kHz. Te actual sound should really be compared by listening to the recordings ahead. The Senal ENG–18RL has noticeably “hotter” (higher) output level at –53 dB/Pa (2.2 m/V/Pa) ± 3 dB, 1Pa = 94 dB SPL, while the RØDE Reporter has –56.0dB re 1 Volt/Pascal (1.00mV @ 94 dB SPL) +/- 2 dB @ 1kHz. In my experience, both mics are well matched with the Tascam DR–10X’s mid gain position. I reviewed the Tascam DR–10X plugin recorder last year. Here’s the link to that review.

However, if you ever had to use a weaker or inferior preamp (as are common even with some broadcast cameras and portable audio recorders), the “hotter” output of the Senal ENG–18RL will be an advantage, since the preamp won’t have to work so hard, and therefore will introduce less noise then when having to boost a lower level signal.

Test recordings and how they were done

The video portions were recorded by Francisco Javier Arbolí using his Sony PXW-X70 (covered in several of my articles) at 1080/29.97p at 50 megabits per second 4:2:2 10-bit. The audio from the camera was used only for reference to sync automatically with the independently recorded audio, which I recorded at uncompressed 48 kHz sampling rate (the digital audio standard for video) at 24-bit resolution using the Tascam DR–10X plugin recorder (reviewed last year) with AGC off, medium gain, low cut on in both cases. The results you will hear were normalized, but not equalized or compressed.

Recording with the RØDE Reporter

Recording with the Senal ENG–18RL

I made the automatic audio/video synchronization, muted the camera reference audio, and inserted the lower thirds (designed by Gonzalo Mendiola of IVIUX) in a 1920×1080 at 29.97p project Final Cut Pro X and published directly from there.

What’s in the Senal brand name and the ENG-RL model number?

 

The ENG–18RL is interesting, as well as the Senal brand name.

If you speak Castilian (castellano), you will notice that the word Senal es very similar to the word señal in Castilian. If you translate it to English, it means “signal”.
UPDATE: The Senal public relations department just confirmed that the brand name was indeed derived from the Castilian word señal 🙂

The prefix ENG

The ENG prefix obviously refers to ENG (Electronic News Gathering).

The number 18

The number 18 doesn’t match the length of the microphone in centimeters or inches, but it is a Kabbalistic number considered to be equivalent to life and good luck do to its connection to the Hebrew word חַי.
UPDATE: The Senal public relations department just clarified that the number 18 refers to the size of the capsule, in millimeters.

The letters R and L

The final L probably refers to Long, since there is a shorter model available called ENG–18R, which I have not reviewed. I don’t know what the R means.

Conclusions

Both the US$99 Senal ENG–18RL and the US$129 RØDE Reporter feel very sturdy in the hand, and both snapped perfectly onto the Tascam DR–10XL plugin recorder. Both sounded nearly identical, but I know from experience that our ProVideo Coalition readers/viewers listeners often have very strong opinions. Feel free to comment below about the sound you hear from each of these two microphones.

For some reason, one of the very few online sources with a reasonable price seems to be B&H Photo Video. Other websites seem to be doubling the price. Also, I noticed that B&H offers a US$299 bundle of the Senal ENG–18RL together with the same Tascam DR–10X recorder I own and used for this test, 4 AAA NiMH rechargeable batteries & charger, a mic flag, an 8GB memory card and a K-Tek KR–50–70 synthetic fur windsock. That seems to be an amazing price, keeping in mind that since I originally purchased the Tascam DR–10X recorder, its street price rose from US$160 to US$180, so only adding US$180 + US$99 for the ENG–18RL comes up to US$279, without the batteries, charger, memory card, mic flag and windsock. It seems to be an excellent package price, even if you don’t use all of the items.

Related articles

Please see the recent related articles:

Upcoming articles, books, consulting, radio programs and seminars

Stand by for upcoming articles, reviews, and books. Sign up to my free mailing list by clicking here.

Si deseas suscribirte a mi lista en castellano, visita aquí. Si prefieres, puedes suscribirte a ambas listas (castellano e inglés).

Contact Allan Tépper for consulting, or find a full listing of his books, articles and upcoming seminars and webinars at AllanTepper.com. Listen to his CapicúaFM show at CapicúaFM.com in iTunes or Stitcher.

FTC disclosure

No manufacturer is specifically paying Allan Tépper or TecnoTur LLC to write this article or the mentioned books. Some of the other manufacturers listed above have contracted Tépper and/or TecnoTur LLC to carry out consulting and/or translations/localizations/transcreations. Many of the manufacturers listed above have sent Allan Tépper review units, including RØDE and Senal. So far, none of the manufacturers listed above is/are sponsors of the TecnoTur programs, although they are welcome to do so, and some are, may be (or may have been) sponsors of ProVideo Coalition magazine.

Copyright and use of this article

The articles contained in the TecnoTur channel in ProVideo Coalition magazine are copyright Allan Tépper/TecnoTur LLC, except where otherwise attributed. Unauthorized use is prohibited without prior approval, except for short quotes which link back to this page, which are encouraged!


Was This Post Helpful:

0 votes, 0 avg. rating

Share Our Article

Born in Connecticut, United States, Allan Tépper is an award-winning broadcaster & podcaster, bilingual consultant, multi-title author, tech journalist, translator, and language activist who has been working with professional video since the eighties. Since 1994,…

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Allan TépperfreemanMemo SaucedaReseña: micrófono dinámico ENG-18RL para entrevistas – Allan Tépper, ¡ése soy yo! Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback

[…] Los micrófonos omnidireccionales dinámicos con conexión XLR balanceada siguen siendo los preferidos de la mayoría de las organizaciones de prensa electrónica para conectar a cámaras o grabadoras profesionales. El año pasado, comparé el micrófono RØDE Reporter con el popular RE50N/DB de Electro-Voice… y ganó el RØDE Reporter por calidad de sonido y precio según los lectores/televidentes/oyentes de la revistaProVideo Coalition. Ahora estoy analizando y comparando el ENG–18LR de la marca Senal (sin ñ, aunque ya me confirmaron que efectivamente derivaron la marca de la palabra señal en castellano) con el ganador del año pasado. Vamos a analizar las especificaciones,… Read more »

Memo Sauceda
Memo Sauceda

Both are very similar, but the RODE might cover the background sound a little better, I say might because it might be that there were more cars on the second test. Anyway, great to be able to hear them both.

freeman
freeman

Le Senal ENG 18RL est un microphone reporter d’excellente qualité, que l’on peut acheter aux USA via ebay La couverture du background est quasi identique au Rode Reporter, ce ne sont pas des microphones cardioïdes ! Pour des omnidirectionnels ces deux microphones couvrent normalement une conversation rapprochée sans aucun problème – pas de pop constaté sur la vidéo