Or: This data doesn’t look like a blonde?
Knowing the stage that every element of a production is at is extremely important for a production manager. The use of digital asset management tools has become essential. You need to be careful though, it can be very easy to rely on the digital data alone to judge the progress of any given department and this can result in surprising failures. The data is only as good as the user that inputs it and the interpretation of the user viewing it.
Some years ago I was involved in a production where studio “A” had spent much time and money developing a very robust asset management tool that allowed for each element in a production to be tracked from department to department. There was even the ability for a production manager to print out compiled information on where any given department was at and show against the schedule as to whether they were on time or not.
I was part of an outsourced team that was using studio “A’s” site in order to complete animation for one of studio “A’s” shows. The tracker had indicated that design had been completed on the episode we were slated to start on. The tracker had a “thumbnail” of the approved art asset along with notes from the director. All indicating things were on schedule. My team then went to download the assets only to discover that the only element that was there was the “thumbnail” and the note that it was completed. No useful elements for doing our part of the job was there. So the “data” showed that things were on track, while, in reality, they were not. The system was flawed.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Marketing Technology Diary: A DAM 2.0 user experience, please (digitalassetmanagement.org.uk)
- Are you interested in a DAM internship or mentorship? (digitalassetmanagement.org.uk)
- Digital Archiving Tool: Amnesty International’s ADAM (digitalassetmanagement.org.uk)
- Asset Management for Business in the Digital World (digitalassetmanagement.org.uk)