Hands-on Review: GoPro Hero3 (part 2)

Side-by-side comparison of the Hero2 and Hero3 cameras.

This is the second part of my hands-on review of the new GoPro Hero3 camera, where I’ve managed a series of side-by-side tests with the Hero2 camera in various scenarios – from multiple frame rates, resolutions and lighting conditions, in both video/still shots, raw and processed with the CineForm Studio software.

If you haven’t already seen Part 1 of my hands-on review of the GoPro Hero3 camera, please check it out before continuing. I’ve not going to cover the same materials or give many specs of the new Hero3 camera here – only provide examples of my comparison testing witht he Hero2* and the resulting info.
*Note that the Hero2 camera I’ve used in these comparisons were with the newly-updated firmware that I shared last month.

The Showdown: GoPro Hero2 vs Hero3


The GoPro Hero2 (left) and the new Hero3 (right) go head-to-head

At first glance, the physical differences are obvious, especially the thinner profile and larger buttons (see Hands-on with the GoPro Hero3: part 1 more for info & specs). But the real differences are what’s inside the Hero3 – the new sensor, glass lens (Hero3 Black Edition) and higher resolution/frame rates sets it apart as a professional addition to your production kit.

I did some tests with individual mounts but primarily most were done with a handheld frame (which was also mounted on a tripod at times). In the shot below, you can see the difference in the LCD screens of each GoPro – the Hero3 on the left and the Hero2 on the right:


The LCDs compared between the Hero2 (right) and Hero3 (left) mounted on a handheld frame

Test #1: Road Test

My first test the day I got home with my new Hero3 was to do a straight side-by-side comparison with roof mounted cameras on a local stretch of road to see how things like resolution, auto white balance, dynamic range and lens distortion looked between the two.


Both the GoPro Hero2 (left) and Hero3 (right) mounted to the top of my Toyota FJ

Here are a few stills from the comparison (all test results are raw & unprocessed and straight out of the cameras). This test was with both cameras set with Protune=ON, AWB=ON, 29.97fps, 1080p (stills resized to 600px wide for posting on PVC)


Driving test 1: Hero2


Driving test 1: Hero3


Driving test 1: Hero2 Detail (100%)


Driving test 1: Hero3 Detail (100%)

Notice the increased resolution in details and wider dynamic range in the sky and the foreground elements. The Hero2 shows a warmer tone and more color saturation in most cases, but also more contrast and less dynamic range and resolution.

Also quite noticeable is the improvement on the barrel distortion of the lens. I have the Hero3 Black Edition which has a glass lens so I have not been able to compare with the Hero3 Silver or White Edition cameras – but a colleague has done measurements for distortion with the Black and Silver and said the FOV of the optics are nearly identical in both cameras.


Driving test 1: Hero2 – FOV/distortion


Driving test 1: Hero3 – FOV/distortion

Test #2: Handheld Walk Test

I took some footage one day/evening around downtown Berkeley and got a range of examples with both the Hero2 & Hero3 mounted side-by-side on a handheld rig. The results were actually surprising, since it was also the first time I really put the Hero2 to the test after updating the firmware, which produced a wider dynamic range than previously, but still, no comparison to the Hero3. I shot afternoon with diverse building shadows and hot reflections, twilight with a mix of ambient light and artificial lights and later at night with all artificial lights, where the GoPro has been notoriously noisy. The results are still not at DSLR level, of course, but definitely “usable” if some filtering is applied.

Here are a few stills from the comparison (all test results are raw & unprocessed and straight out of the cameras). This test was with both cameras set with Protune=ON, AWB=ON, 29.97fps, 1080p (stills resized to 600px wide for posting on PVC)


Handheld test 2: Hero2 – afternoon


Handheld test 2: Hero3 – afternoon


Handheld test 2: Hero2 – twilight


Handheld test 2: Hero3 – twilight


Handheld test 2: Hero2 – night


Handheld test 2: Hero3 – night

Continued on next page…


Test #3: Still Images

Even though the GoPro Hero3 has only 1MP increase over the Hero2 (12MP over 11MP), the still image capture is remarkably improved – especially in noise and compression, as well as improved dynamic range. I did some side-by side comparison tests and blew up a few details to show how the compression artifacts are very different in each of camera’s images – which lends me to think that not only is the sensor different, but somehow they’ve managed to change the JPG compression algorithm to provide a smoother image with less compression damage and less noise.

Below are some of my results. Both shot in wide mode at the highest setting with AWB – straight from the camera and unfiltered/processed and only scaled for publishing online and cropped for detail shots.
Hero2 = 11MP 3840×2880 72ppi
Hero3 = 12MP 4000×3000 72ppi


The GoPro Hero2 11MP still image


The GoPro Hero2 12MP still image


The GoPro Hero2 11MP still image DETAIL @300%


The GoPro Hero2 12MP still image DETAIL @300%

Another test really shows the difference in detail, less noise, more dynamic range and less contrast between the Hero2 and Hero3:


The GoPro Hero2 11MP still image full-frame


The GoPro Hero2 12MP still image full-frame


The GoPro Hero2 11MP still image DETAIL @100%


The GoPro Hero2 12MP still image DETAIL @100%


The GoPro Hero2 11MP still image DETAIL @300%


The GoPro Hero2 12MP still image DETAIL @300%

Test #4: Framerate Test

My final comparison test was to see how the various resolutions and framerates differed between the two cameras. I recall how excited I was when the GoPro Hero2 came out and touted a 120fps mode at WVGA resolution (848×480) which could be slowed-down to about 24fps for incredible slo-motion effects. However, the Hero3 now provides 240fps at the same WVGA resolution and offers tremendous slo-mo playback! It will also provide 120fps recording @ 720p and 60fps @ 1080p which is truly remarkable for a camera of this size and price range!

Below is a test video I compiled showing the comparisons between the two cameras. The first portion shows 60fps played back at 30fps. The second segment shows 4 frames of both cameras shooting at real-time on the left and then slowed-down to 30fps on the right. Notice how clean the Hero3’s 240fps slowed down to 30fps plays back as the wheels tuen on the passing car, which was traveling about 35mph at the time of shooting.


Watch this video comparing framerates & resolution/cropping between the Hero2 and the Hero3

CLICK HERE to read Hands-on with the GoPro Hero3 (part 1) review

_________________________________________________________________

Jeff Foster is a published author of several how-to books and training videos in the motion graphics, animation and video production industries and is an award-winning video producer and artist. Visit his web site to learn more about his training methods, tips & tricks at PixelPainter.com


Tags:
Share:
Jeff Foster

Jeff Foster

Jeff Foster has written and contributed to several books and magazines, and has been producing motion graphics, photography and creative design for major corporations, television and film for more than 20 years. See his full bio and content at http://PixelPainter.com